Northrop Grumman weighing exit options for OmegA rocket

 

Northrop Grumman weighing exit options for OmegA rocket


Northrop Grumman statement: “We will determine next steps once the debriefing process concludes."

WASHINGTON — When Northrop Grumman unveiled its OmegA rocket in April 2018, the company was clear that it developed the vehicle for the sole purpose of challenging United Launch Alliance and SpaceX for national security space launch contracts.

The Air Force decided to stick with ULA and SpaceX to provide launch services from 2022 to 2027. Without a significant commercial business to fall back on, OmegA does not appear to have a future.

But Northrop Grumman says no final decisions will be made until after the Air Force briefs the company on the reasons why the vehicle was not selected.

“The post-award debriefing process currently is underway, and we are learning more about the U.S. Space Force’s evaluation decisions,” Northrop Grumman spokeswoman Jennifer Bowman told SpaceNews Aug. 21. “We will determine next steps once the debriefing process concludes,” she said. “We are very proud of our OmegA designs and the value that OmegA can provide to the U.S. Space Force and other customers.”

Ars Technica reporter Eric Berger on Thursday tweeted that Northrop Grumman had informed employees earlier this week that it was not moving forward with OmegA. The company declined to comment or confirm this.

The Air Force had been co-investing in the solid-propulsion OmegA since 2018 under a $792 million six-year agreement. That funding will be terminated because the vehicle did not win a launch services contract. The Air Force, however, said the timing for ending the agreement and other issues have yet to be negotiated.

“We have to determine what work has been done and what rights to the data the government has. We want to make sure we retain those,” Assistant Secretary of the Air Force for Acquisition Will Roper said Aug. 7.

In the months prior to the Air Force’s selection, Northrop Grumman officials said OmegA was on track for its first flight in 2021. The company in December announced it had signed up its first customer, the startup Saturn Satellite Networks, to launch a small geostationary communications satellite.

During a July 30 earnings call with analysts , Northrop Grumman CEO Kathy Warden was asked about the future of OmegA if it did not win an Air Force launch services contract.

“If we are not successful, we would continue to leverage that investment,” Warden said.

She said the investment in OmegA for national security space launch “was a way to share our research and development investments across the product line that we can now utilize for other endeavors.”

If OmegA goes out of business, Northrop Grumman still will have plenty of customers for its solid rocket motors. It will supply solid boosters to United Launch Alliance for its Vulcan Centaur rocket. It also has a contract to produce heavy-lift boosters for NASA’s Space Launch System.

Northrop Grumman’s biggest contract for solid rocket motors will be for the Air Force’s Ground Base Strategic Deterrent, a new intercontinental ballistic missile. The Air Force plans to award the GBSD contract this fall.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

You may soon be able to ride to the edge of space from Alaska in a Balloon

Image
You may soon be able to ride to the edge of space from Alaska in a Balloon Florida-based startup firm Space Perspective plans to use the Pacific Spaceport Complex in Kodiak to serve as one of the launch sites for the vehicle, called the Spaceship Neptune A company wants to use an advanced balloon to fly customers from Earth’s surface in Alaska to the highest reaches of the planet’s atmosphere. Florida-based startup firm Space Perspective plans to use the Pacific Spaceport Complex in Kodiak to serve as one of the launch sites for the vehicle, called the Spaceship Neptune,  The Anchorage Daily News  reported on Sunday. The balloon rides will be manned by a flight crew taking eight passengers in a pressurized capsule suspended beneath a hydrogen balloon the size of a football stadium. Each passenger could pay an estimated $125,000 for a six-hour journey. Mark Lester, CEO of Alaska Aerospace Corp., said the high-altitude rides will be available from Kodiak in a few years and will ...
Read more

Committee recommends review of planetary protection policies

Image
Committee recommends review of planetary protection policies WASHINGTON — The NASA Advisory Council has recommended that NASA review its existing planetary protection guidelines to balance the needs of science and exploration, an effort that could set the stage for a similar revision at the international level. The council, during a two-day meeting at NASA Headquarters Dec. 10–11, adopted a recommendation calling on NASA to establish an interdisciplinary committee of experts to review the agency’s current requirements for preventing contamination of other worlds by NASA spacecraft as well as any contamination of the Earth by materials brought back from those worlds. “NASA should establish a multidisciplinary task force of experts from industry, the scientific community, and relevant government agencies, to develop U.S. policies that properly balance the legitimate need to protect against the harmful contamination of the Earth or other celestial bodies with the scientific, social, and e...
Read more

Surprise! There's more water on Jupiter than anyone thought

Surprise! There's more water on Jupiter than anyone thought Jupiter  appears to have more water than anyone expected. Newly released data from  NASA's Juno probe shows that water may make up about 0.25% of the molecules in the atmosphere over Jupiter's equator. While that doesn't sound like much, the calculation is based on a prevalence of water's components, hydrogen and oxygen, three times more than at the sun. The new measurements Juno obtained are much higher than a previous mission suggested. The surprise result has scientists delving deep again into results from  NASA's Galileo mission to Jupiter , which obtained drier results in 1995 when engineers deliberately threw the spacecraft into Jupiter's atmosphere. (Galileo was low on fuel and NASA didn't want to take the chance, even if it was a slight one, of the spacecraft accidentally crashing on a potentially habitable icy moon.) Reconciling the results from Galileo and Juno is key for sc...
Read more